I came to
practice painting in mid-life. I had done so in college when I studied art history as a
younger man, but let my budding artistic desires get sidetracked. In the mid-90's I
decided to return to art school. This decision came after the loss of several friends to
AIDS. I developed a visceral awareness of my own mortality and came to believe if I had
anything I felt I ought to do in this life worthwhile, I ought to get down to business and
do it. I started painting. But I cannot say I picked up a brush and never looked back, not
at all. It was more by fits and starts, and I found my art history background both a
friend and an enemy. My truest friends have been my intuition and my inclination to the
spiritual. Having been ex-communicated from the Pentecostal church I belonged to long ago
for coming out of the closet, my spirituality has taken a more personal form that has
evolved over time, and I have no formal brand name to give it. The more I paint from my
intuition/spirituality and the less I listen to my old academic notions of "great
art," the better my work becomes.
I don't, however, try to disregard art history entirely. My greatest heroes in painting,
if I have to narrow it down, would be Clyfford Still, Jackson Pollock, and Jay DeFeo. My
experience of DeFeo's masterpiece, The Rose, was so moving that it has become the single
most influential painting on my work. This unusual painting gave me permission to
experiment with my work in ways that I had not felt I had prior to viewing it. Asian
calligraphy and the Graffiti that is part of my urban experience in the Bay Area also
influence my work (I moved here 14 years ago from the rural Mid-west). These inspirations
prove to me that abstraction is the most powerful and satisfying way to depict that which
is beyond the particular, specific, material and limited. For me, appearances are always
deceiving and it is what lies behind them that is true, good and beautiful. It also gives
the viewer the room to project his/her own experiences into the work--I, for example,
cannot read Asian calligraphy or much of the Graffiti I see, I am forced to experience
them aesthetically. No doubt I lose much of what is intended by the creators, but I have
my own experience that I treasure.
I am also intrigued by the mystery of trying to decode characters and symbols I do not
understand or have only a partial understanding. My ignorance forces me to turn toward the
aesthetic, I cannot even comprehend the tag on the BART station or the newspapers in
Chinatown--but they move me. What is this?
It seems to me that our lives move too fast and are too crowded with too many demands and
things and stimuli. It is difficult for me to believe that in our hectic society people
have adequate time for themselves, for their minds and souls to breathe and recharge. I
think of my paintings as places where people can come, if they can find the time, to
relax, or meditate, or even worship. I don't think it at all heresy or grandiose to claim
that my paintings are sacred places not unlike temples. I claim it with humility because
painting is a spiritual practice for me. It connects me with the sublime and the
transcendent. I hope that this is part of the experience for the viewer. If it is, then I
have succeeded. |